Sustainable Iran–China cooperation requires more than political agreements and trade. It depends on reliable legal, banking, registration, judicial, technological, and enforcement infrastructure that reduces transaction risks and increases predictability.
Problem Statement
The absence or weakness of supporting legal and institutional infrastructure increases transaction costs and creates uncertainty in contracts, payments, dispute resolution, and enforcement. Strengthening these mechanisms is essential for expanding bilateral economic cooperation.
Relation to the Call for Proposals
The proposal directly addresses two priorities: economic governance and domestic reforms for cooperation with China, and regulation, law, and cooperation standards.
Analytical Framework: Legal Differences Are Not a Barrier to Cooperation
The goal is not to harmonize Iran’s and China’s legal systems, but to develop compatible and reliable mechanisms that address shared needs such as transparency, contract security, identity verification, digital evidence, and enforcement.
Existing Policy Gaps in Iran
- Cross-Border Contract Infrastructure
Iran needs stronger mechanisms for online contracts, identity and authority verification, beneficial ownership identification, electronic signatures, and recognition of digital documents.
- Financial, Banking, and Documentary Infrastructure
Closer integration between contracts, payments, banking records, and financial documents is needed to reduce uncertainty and improve the traceability of transactions.
- Consular Services and Official Certifications
Digitizing and integrating consular and document-certification services can reduce delays, administrative costs, human error, and fraud, while improving document verification.
- Transparency and Predictability in Dispute Resolution
Greater access to searchable and systematic judicial and quasi-judicial decisions can improve transparency, accountability, and predictability in commercial disputes.
- Transparency in Arbitration and Evaluation of Arbitrators
Controlled transparency in arbitration awards, while protecting confidentiality and commercial secrets, can improve the evaluation of arbitral practices and increase predictability.
- Digital Evidence and Data
Clear standards are needed for the authentication, preservation, origin, integrity, and legal admissibility of digital evidence and records.
- Cross-Border Electronic Service
Iran and China need reliable mechanisms for valid, traceable cross-border electronic service, alongside broader domestic coverage of electronic judicial notification.
- Effective Enforcement of Judgments
Improving the enforcement of financial and commercial judgments is essential because the practical value of a legal decision ultimately depends on its effective implementation.
- Transparency of Expert Opinions
Greater transparency and systematic access to expert opinions could help identify conflicting assessments, improve consistency, and increase predictability in legal proceedings.
- Counterparty Verification and Risk Assessment
Beyond basic identity verification, businesses need mechanisms to assess commercial history, creditworthiness, default risk, and relevant dispute records when selecting foreign partners.
Policy Options
Option 1: Maintaining the Current System with Limited Improvements
Individual institutions would make incremental improvements, but institutional fragmentation and gaps between contracts, payments, dispute resolution, and enforcement would remain.
Option 2: Focusing Mainly on Major Economic and Political Agreements
This approach prioritizes high-level agreements while leaving supporting legal, banking, and enforcement infrastructure secondary, potentially preserving major operational risks.
Option 3: Targeted Infrastructure Development
A coordinated program would address high-risk areas through standards, pilot projects, data architecture, institutional reforms, and transparency mechanisms.
Main Proposal
Pillar 1: Standardizing Contractual, Identity, and Financial Interactions
Develop frameworks for electronic cross-border contracts, identity verification, beneficial ownership, electronic signatures, and stronger links between contracts and payments.
Pillar 2: Smart Consular and Official Certification Services
Digitize and integrate consular services and official document certification to make cross-border commercial processes faster, more transparent, and traceable.
Pillar 3: Transparency and Predictability in Judicial Institutions
Improve systematic access to judicial and quasi-judicial decisions while protecting personal and commercial information through appropriate anonymization.
Pillar 4: Improving Judgment Enforcement
Modernize enforcement procedures, particularly for financial and commercial cases, through structured judgments, automated data extraction, and measurable performance indicators.
Pillar 5: Controlled Transparency in Arbitration and Expert Assessment
Create mechanisms for the controlled publication and analysis of arbitration awards and expert opinions while preserving legitimate confidentiality.
Pillar 6: Electronic Service and Digital Evidence
Develop reliable cross-border electronic service mechanisms and clear standards for the preservation and authentication of digital evidence.
Implementation Requirements
- Coordination Mechanism
A designated cross-sectoral institution or task force should coordinate the program and prevent institutional fragmentation.
- Balanced and Reciprocal Approach
The framework should improve Iran’s domestic capacity while also establishing reciprocal expectations for China regarding transparency, document recognition, dispute resolution, and enforcement.
- Data Governance and Access
Clear rules are required for data governance, confidentiality, security, responsibility, and access across contractual, judicial, banking, and administrative systems.
To read more, download full paper
