An Analytical Note from the International Relations Think Tank on Donald Trump’s Performance and the Inconsistencies of His Foreign Policy with the Core Values of the Nobel Peace Prize
Abstract
Since its establishment in 1895 through Alfred Nobel’s will, the Nobel Peace Prize has consistently been recognized as a symbol of fostering lasting peace and strengthening solidarity among nations. The award is granted to those who have “done the most or the best work for fraternity among nations, the reduction of standing armies, and the promotion of peace congresses.” In this context, despite his controversial stances and contradictory international policies, Donald Trump has made several attempts to obtain the prize. From public speeches at the United Nations to direct claims of his own merit, he has followed a path quite different from that of previous laureates—a path largely based on lobbying and public display rather than tangible actions toward peace.
Some of the key headings of this article are:
Contradictions of Trump’s Foreign Policy with Nobel Values
Trump’s foreign policies, including exiting the Paris Agreement and initiating trade wars, contradict the core values of the Nobel Peace Prize by undermining international cooperation and trust.
Lobbying and Undermining the Credibility of the Nobel Prize
Trump’s repeated lobbying for the Nobel Peace Prize contradicts the committee’s emphasis on independence and humility, potentially damaging his credibility rather than improving his chance.
Comparison with Past Laureates
Trump lacks the reconciliatory or reformative actions that previous controversial winners demonstrated.
Humanitarian Organizations
Groups like UNHCR, UNICEF, and Doctors Without Borders embody Nobel’s vision more effectively than Trump.
Expert Opinions
Scholars agree Trump’s contradictory policies and alliance damage disqualify him.
Risk to Nobel Credibility
Awarding Trump could undermine the prize’s ethical authority, whereas recognizing humanitarian actors strengthens it.
Conclusion
Trump’s pursuit reflects a quest for legitimacy rather than real peace impact; true laureates act in crisis zones, not through lobbying or speeches.
This study was conducted at International Relations Think Tank analysis network in 2025.
To read more, click here
